What major tests like PISA and NAPLAN get wrong about Indigenous students

While headlines focused on Indigenous students scoring below non-Indigenous students, the data tells a more nuanced story.

As we recognise the anniversary of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, this paper asks whether it is time to move from measuring Indigenous students against non-Indigenous benchmarks.

When the results get reported as a straight issue of “performance” this over simplifies a much more complex situation. And is precisely how deficit framing works.

When the benchmark is the non-Indigenous student, the shortfall is located in the Indigenous student – rather than the education system. Or the broader society.

We should instead look to assess whether our education systems are delivering on Indigenous rights, self-determination, and success.

Read the Article

Image
Image

The ARC Centre of Excellence for Indigenous Futures is supported by its partners and funded by the Australian Government through the Australian Research Council.

Acknowledgement

The ARC Centre of Excellence for Indigenous Futures acknowledges and honours the Traditional Custodians of the land on which our Centre operates. We acknowledge Elders past, present, and emerging and recognise this was always a place of learning, teaching, and research, and that Sovereignty was never ceded.

SIGN UP TO OUR QUARTERLY NEWSLETTER

* indicates required

CONTACT

Email: indigenousfutures@uq.edu.au
Level 5, Sir Llew Edwards Building (14)
The University of Queensland
St Lucia, 4072

SITE LINKS